BALANCED+ Inc. · 2025–2026
Ending unreviewed production changes with a change process that held
I authored and implemented a formal change management process routed through the ITSM tool, with a strict no-ticket-no-change rule and two named approvers. It eliminated unreviewed production changes.
- Role
- Authored the process and secured approver sign-off
- Focus
- Governance, Change management, ITSM
Outcomes
- Unreviewed production changes eliminated
- Sign-off secured from two approvers
The problem
Changes were reaching production without review. This is rarely a discipline problem. It happens because the reviewed path is slower than the unreviewed one, so under pressure people take the fast route.
What I did
I authored a formal change management process and routed it through the ITSM tool, so raising a change was the same motion as raising anything else rather than a separate piece of paperwork. The rule was deliberately blunt: no ticket, no change.
The part that made it stick was getting two named approvers signed off before launch. A process with an owner is a process; a process without one is a document.
Want to talk about work like this?
I am open to technical account management and professional services roles in Toronto.